Skip to main content

Hey Google: Your Phones Are Too Damned High!

     I Do Not Want to Upgrade to a Smaller Phone, Google!

Planned Obsolescence: A real F U you move to consumers


The Proud and Might Nexus 6, or Shamoo as it is nicknamed.


Obsolescence for the desktop computer has historically been two years.  Currently that cycle has come to a screeching halt.  Innovation is at a standstill. Smartphones are the center of computing for most.  They now have a two-year cycle.

                Google’s once  standard bearing phone, the Nexus 6, is at the end of the line for updates.  After two years on the market, no more operating system updates is the hard and fast rule. 

From my vantage point, this is all about forcing you to shell out more cash for a phone you do not need, or may even want.  Has technology advanced so far so fast that two years is it for a handheld?  Is this necessary?  I am not convinced that it has this way, unless you want to perpetual live on the bleeding edge of technology.

                Over time, phones have gone from having replaceable batteries to those that no longer have this option  The one element that can be replaced easily is no longer so. The unsaid concept is that phones are a disposable commodity. You are supposed to get sick of them after two year.

                High-end smartphones cost as much as some desktops, some even more.  There is considerable expense involved keeping up with the tech crowd.  There are also enormous profits for phone makers.  

                What is truly awful about this “ticking time bomb” approach to technology is that newer versions may not be as fully featured as their replacements.

Pixel? Why not Nexus 7?  who knows, but this is the flagship phone now.


 I have a case in point.

                The Nexus 6 is still a great device.  I liked it from day one, and enjoy every moment I use it.  It has the same charm as the day I turned it on.

Nicknamed “Shamoo” for its massive nearly six inch screen, it is big, but it can rest inside of a standard pocket.  Of all of the handhelds I have ever had, this is the only smartphone I have ever owned that did not need a system reset, ever.   I can install, uninstall, and this phone performs like a champion. Everything works, and the stats are still impressive.

                In what has to be a true “bone headed” move, the follow up, The Nexus 6P, was smaller than the Nexus 6!   The new version offered only 5.7 inches of screen real-estate.

                Why the shrink?  I have no idea. There are many out there smaller.  If this was not bad enough, the most current replacement for the 6P are the new Pixel line. They come in at five inches.  Why is smaller better, and why no options?

                The new Pixel is not exactly inexpensive either.   If there is an unlocked Pixel, I have not seen it.  When you look to purchase, the adverts show it as a Verizon phone.  Verizon is not exactly a discount carrier.

                While the arena of smartphones is a highly competitive industry, smartphones still command high prices.  Price wars are non-existent.  If you want a reasonable phone, you are looking at a flagship or something close.  You can opt for lesser models. That is an option.  However, from what I have seen, discount smart phones are glitchy, slow and frustrating to use.  

While a PC can still be functional and not be at the top tier, smartphones exist in an all or nothing world. You pay a little, and get a lot less.  The features most of us want are in higher end phones. Sadly, that comes at a cost.

Let’s say you bit the bullet and fork over five or eight Franklins for a phone. What you are looking at is a device that will be rendered old fashioned and non-supportable in a scant two years.   If you are willing to play the “I must have the latest,” you are looking at $ 400 or so every year in addition to the already obscene cost of service. 

What I do not see with smartphones are any new exciting features.  What more can be added that makes new versions so expensive or even desirable? 

Phone designs are clones of each other.   Without the logo you can’t tell them apart. The   mantra is thinner, and thinner.  What no one is apparently concerned with is making them better, or less expensive. 

Why can’t we have a high quality DSLR camera married to smartphone that is not uber expensive?  Even if it means violating the holy grail of mobile phones  and be a bit bulky, why not ask the technologically advanced to make it so? 

Once upon a time, I was one of those, “trash the pc” every two or three years to be current.  Now ,with the new economic reality of America, I cannot afford to do it.  The sad face of computing is there is nothing out there that gives me a compelling reason to think upgrading. Whatever gains come, they are not worth two grand.  As a side note, I reviewed a truly high powered PC and it was not so much better than my current system.

I feel the exact same way about smartphones.  Google has not only given me no compelling reason to get a Pixel phone, it is giving  me compelling reasons to keep my trusty, wonderful Nexus 6 until he passes away.  Shamoo, your big screen is still beautiful to behold.  I promise to keep you until you can compute no more. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The First Signs of Real Change

The Washington Protests: the shape of things to come  A Limo on Fire, a wake up call, or A prelude of things to come? P rotests broke out in Washington D.C. during the inauguration of the controversial 45th President of the United States.  A distinguishing feature of this one was that it was not the product of spontaneous pandemonium.  This organized event brought together several groups unified in their shared beliefs.                 One statement made by this collective was so powerful that it explained succinctly the reasons for the discontent. It was a powerful message.                 Seeing a stretch limousine battered and flaming is an arresting image. What made this one potent were words spray-painted on the side “We The People.”  The connection between those words and the anger that co...

The Democratic Debates 2019

What have we learned from this "Food Fight" Part P.T. Barnum and Baily to several parts serious political discourse, one thing did come from all of this.  Past the novelty of having too many candidates with far too little to say on one stage, a star was born.  A few also happened to burn out, one in comic glory, of a sort. The first night of debates lacked any drama at all, good or bad.  The clear and undisputed winner was Elizabeth Warren.  While many see her elect-ability factor as a down side, she was the only person on the stage that left an impression.  She had a clear idea of what she was going to do and how to do it.  Everyone else, sadly, was one great big snooze fest.   There was no energy, no electricity.  There was no “ah” moment that made you feel strongly about anyone.  It was simply dry. No one seemed to grasp the idea that political life is part entertainment.  The only one who seemed to get that point w...

Pleasure Palace: A review of the documentary Queen of Versailles

The Queen of Versailles The 2008 financial crisis was the worst since the infamous Great Depression of 1929, the one that ended both fortunes and lives.   Florida billionaires David and Jackie Siegel found themselves impacted by the most recent as they began construction on their massive 90,000 square foot home.   If completed, it would be the largest private residence in the United States.   It is titled, appropriately enough, “ Versailles.”   The ironies in this tale are just beginning. Documentarian Lauren Greenfield was given free access to chronicle the lives of the Siegel’s at the apex of their wealth.   She incidentally caught them at the near total collapse of it.   In what could be the perfect storm for a film maker, Greenfields timing provides a fascinating view of the lives of the super rich, and it is not a particularly appealing one. It all begins like a fable.    It all turns out like the American Dream pumped on st...