Skip to main content

Rocketman: A new Biopic About Sir Elton John


Sunday, June 2, 2019

The colorful rise of Sir Elton John


A review Kurt von Behrmann

Brief Synopsis: A biopic about singer songwriter Sir Elton John’s rise to International Stardom .
Director: Dexter Fletcher  Writer: Lee Hall (screenplay)  Stars: Taron Egerton, Jamie Bell, Richard Madden
               
                Biopics of contemporary musicians follow a specific story arc.   Born into humble beginnings and raised by dysfunctional families they struggle, work hard and then achieve overwhelming fame.  As soon as the success arrives, excess, alienation and addiction follow.   The journey ends with a triumphant redemptive return to the spotlight. 

                The template for these films is a cinematic treatment of an episode of “Behind The Music.”  In an attempt to freshen up the formula, Rocketman begins with a resplendent Sir Elton John decked in orange feathers and devil horns walking down a long corridor.  His walk ends not with a stage, but with a support group.  Although the framing device feels like exactly what it is, a contrivance, at least the film makers are trying something to break up the usual narrative.

                Whatever opinions, you may have about Rocketman, you cannot deny that Taron Egerton gives a captivating performance as John from insecure struggling musician to a lonely megastar.  In a wise move, he does his own singing.   The result makes for some of the film’s most successful moments; Egerton singing.   He has avoided the pitfalls of portraying a recognized person by not relying of over exaggeration.  There are points where you become lost in the illusion because the actor has created such a convincing facsimile.

                Where the film starts to show signs of stress are where we are given way too much time with a young Elton and far too little time witnessing the changes success brings.   Unlike Bohemian Rhapsody, also directed by Dexter Fletcher, where we actually see the musicians crafting their songs in the studio, we have very little film time devoted to John’s creative process, or inner workings.  

                The effort spent on John’s childhood starts to feel as if he has an axe to grind, rather than tell an effective story.  Clearly there are still some deep-seated resentments still here.  The portrait he creates of his mother and father are, to say the least, extremely unflattering.  Grandmother does get a hall pass for being supportive. She is the only person in this outfit capable of providing any love, or even warmth.

                 His mother is painted as self-centered, cold and slutty.  His father is an arctic wasteland of a man absent of discernable emotions.  No doubt there is pain here, but the point is made so often as to be redundant. 

                I am more than willing to allow a film like this to play fast and furious with the truth.  This is a biopic, not a fact-based documentary.  I can accept songs being played out of chronological order. What is harder to accept is that some of the songs do not advance the story line as well as others in John’s dense catalogue.

                The critically acclaimed and commercially successful “Captain Fantastic and the Brown Dirty Cowboy” is rich with songs that could easily propel this storyline.  The entire album is autobiographical in nature.  Why more songs of this type were not used is puzzling.   

                John has always had a strong ear for melody.  But some of these songs are misplaced given the context in which they are placed.  It is almost as if there were a mandate to cram as many hits as possible, even if it means shorting truly moving songs to just a few bars. “Daniel” is unjustifiably given little screen time as if it were lesser material.   

Making an entrance as only Elton John can


                Another odd creative choice is the levitation scene when John plays the legendary “Troubadour.”   This performance building moment.    In this scene John and his audience are levitated, literally lifted by the music into the air.  Rather than support the music, this visual effect distracts from it.

                 Had they been true to the realty of his performances, John played mainly slower tempo material.  His sets were mainly ballads, a real strength of his.  Considering that this was at the height of the singer songwriter period, think Neil Young, Carol King, James Taylor, Joni Mitchell, CSN and sometimes Y,  I would have thought something moving might have been a better choice. 

                Here again, Bohemian Rhapsody let the music do the heavy lifting with the visuals in support of the material.   Just the opposite happens here where the music is in a tug of war with the dance numbers and visuals.

                At times, Rocketman feels like a demo for a Broadway musical rather than a complete film.  The fantasy elements are such that it almost feels too light in some areas and too heavy in others.
                One thing the P.R. for the film have made much ado over is the homosexuality present.  To be honest, you will see greater and far more explicit gay content on H.B.O. than you will here.   Rocketman does not gloss over the gay content, but it is not presented in any overt way either. The same holds true of the excesses like John’s  eating disorder, shopping addiction, sexual additions and substance abuse.  It is there, but not considered in any great detail.

                If you are expecting a film that showcases the nitty gritty of life on the road, the excesses of stardom or the inner torments of a talented figure in music, you maybe disappointed.  This is not an examination of a man’s life.  It is a celebration of one in song and dance.

                If anything, Rocketman is the musical version of Sir Elton John’s life presented with vibrant colors, musical numbers and a considerable amount of showmanship and razzle dazzle.  The aim of this biopic is to see the artist as a colorful treasure above and beyond the normal world.  A Phoenix that can rise out of his own ashes.  As pure entertainment, this biopic manages to hit the right notes most of the time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The First Signs of Real Change

The Washington Protests: the shape of things to come  A Limo on Fire, a wake up call, or A prelude of things to come? P rotests broke out in Washington D.C. during the inauguration of the controversial 45th President of the United States.  A distinguishing feature of this one was that it was not the product of spontaneous pandemonium.  This organized event brought together several groups unified in their shared beliefs.                 One statement made by this collective was so powerful that it explained succinctly the reasons for the discontent. It was a powerful message.                 Seeing a stretch limousine battered and flaming is an arresting image. What made this one potent were words spray-painted on the side “We The People.”  The connection between those words and the anger that co...

The Democratic Debates 2019

What have we learned from this "Food Fight" Part P.T. Barnum and Baily to several parts serious political discourse, one thing did come from all of this.  Past the novelty of having too many candidates with far too little to say on one stage, a star was born.  A few also happened to burn out, one in comic glory, of a sort. The first night of debates lacked any drama at all, good or bad.  The clear and undisputed winner was Elizabeth Warren.  While many see her elect-ability factor as a down side, she was the only person on the stage that left an impression.  She had a clear idea of what she was going to do and how to do it.  Everyone else, sadly, was one great big snooze fest.   There was no energy, no electricity.  There was no “ah” moment that made you feel strongly about anyone.  It was simply dry. No one seemed to grasp the idea that political life is part entertainment.  The only one who seemed to get that point w...

Pleasure Palace: A review of the documentary Queen of Versailles

The Queen of Versailles The 2008 financial crisis was the worst since the infamous Great Depression of 1929, the one that ended both fortunes and lives.   Florida billionaires David and Jackie Siegel found themselves impacted by the most recent as they began construction on their massive 90,000 square foot home.   If completed, it would be the largest private residence in the United States.   It is titled, appropriately enough, “ Versailles.”   The ironies in this tale are just beginning. Documentarian Lauren Greenfield was given free access to chronicle the lives of the Siegel’s at the apex of their wealth.   She incidentally caught them at the near total collapse of it.   In what could be the perfect storm for a film maker, Greenfields timing provides a fascinating view of the lives of the super rich, and it is not a particularly appealing one. It all begins like a fable.    It all turns out like the American Dream pumped on st...