Skip to main content

A review of H.B.O.'s Documentary on The Michelle Carter Case


I Love You, Now Die: The Commonwealth v. Michelle Carter
An H.B.O. Documentary

H.B.O.'s Haunting Documentary 


Director Erin Lee Carr

Quick Assessment: This is must see viewing.

A review by Kurt von Behrmann



On July 2014, 18-year-old Conrad Roy completed suicide.  It took placed in his truck. The vehicle was parked at a Kmart parking lot in Fairhaven, Mass.   What happened afterwards would have sweeping ramifications.

What transformed this tragedy into a media feeding frenzy was a series of text messages exchanged between Conrad Roy and his girlfriend Michelle Carter.  In a series of feverish, even hectoring, text messages, she was imploring him to kill himself.

Two lives forever changed when thy met and began a constant stream of text messages.

  
Director Erin Lee Carr has constructed a documentary that delves into the critical details were missed in  the wide spread media coverage.  The narrative that was disseminated failed to present the complexity of the events that ended one life and wrecked others. The lingering question of was, and still is, was Michelle Carter in part, or even wholly, responsible for Roy’s death.

This question sits at the center of controversy like an immobile object that almost defies comprehension.  As this documentary makes explicitly clear, there are no easy answers.
The story commonly told painted Michelle Carter as a callous, cruel, attention seeking adolescent anxious to become the grieving girlfriend.  She was also the arresting looking model thin blonde who used her influence to send a  young man to his death.  The story was reduced to being a lured tale of a heartless manipulative teenage girl with decidedly evil self-serving intentions.

This documentary makes a compelling point that this tragedy cannot be summed up so simply.  The complexities of Carter and Roy’s relationship and the elements surrounded their lives add layer upon layer of nuance. 

The Carter Family, stoic and forever silent.


The underlying narrative of this suicide played to the fears of men, and adults in general, wary of what teenage girls can do, and the damage they can possibly inflict.  This played to deep-seated fears regarding female sexuality in general and male vulnerability to it. This anxiety also obscured the reality of what was at the heart of this case, and incidentally the brief life of Conrad Roy.
This documentary, which spans a scant two parts, manages to use the running time timely wisely. The pacing is miraculous concise. It also serves to keep things from becoming stagnant.  There are no resting moments in this documentary that propels itself forward based on some compelling facts presented well.

Unfortunately, Director Erin Lee Carr was denied access to Michelle Carter, or her family. To this day Carter and her family have avoided all media requests for interviews. They remain to this day silent.
 While this may have been a serious liability, Carter, adroitly uses the text messages exchanged between  the troubled teenagers to illustrate type of relationship they had, which was almost completely  confined to text messages.  They only met a few times, maybe five at the most.


The bulk of Carter and Roy’s relationship was an epistolary one carried out in cyberspace. The exchanges were personal, complicated, messy and internalized.  At the start, Carter acturally tried to talk Roy out of killing himself.  At this phase of their many exchanges, he is sending images of guns and talking about suicide at great length.  Then, as if persuaded by Roy, Carter begins to support his desire to end his life.  This was a fact left out of all contemporary coverage of the trial.  It is an important detail.

Carr works hard to create a somewhat  more objective view of  Carter, who is far from being the kind of person that can draw sympathy.  No matter what the extenuating circumstances, it is difficult to get past the rigid façade of a person who appears unmoved, silent almost sphinx like. She is an indecipherable cipher at the center of a horrific storm.

Two lives changed. One ended tragically and the other facing an uncertain future.


As hard as it is to see Carter as remotely likeable, which she is not, the person that emerges is that of a lonely, emotionally needy, woman.  It is easy to see hear as  seriously mental ill, particularly when viewing her past

Carter was struggling with bulimia, and had a history of attempting suicide prior to meeting Roy.   As we discover, Roy had a long history of mental illness with several hospitalizations prior to meeting Carter as well. 

Another fact over looked in the coverage of this case was the violent home environment where Roy was raised.  His mother and father had physical altercations.  They eventually divorced.  Roy’s father openly admits to striking is son, and stated he would do it again in the documentary. 

This openness is surprising as it is alarming given the outcome of the events. At no point does Roy’s father make the connection that the violence in the home may have been a contributing factor to his son’s deteriorating mental health.  The documentary showed stills of Roy’s scarred face.

One of the big questions this trial raises is can a text message be so powerful that it can cause death?  At no point was Carter physically near Roy when he died.  Are the texts sent over time sufficient reason enough to hold Carter liable?  Is Michelle Carter responsible for the death of Conrad Roy?  
Given her serious mental health issues, was she in the same predicament as Roy?  Where they just two teens drawn to each other because of their compromised state of mind?   Was this inevitable?

The persistent question was that was overlooked was Carter’s state of mind.  There is the question of how stable was she.  She had a reputation among friends for not being truthful. At one point she accused Roy of rape.  She also had a bizarre fixation on Glee Star Lea Michele.

She frequently cited not only lines from the show, but interviews Michele gave and used them as her own words.   Further exchanges between Roy and Michelle reveal a young woman playing out a fantasy that mirrored the reality of a television star

Carr’s documentary feels like it could have continued for more episodes. This engaging, fascinating case is told with precision, imagination and a sense of tone that fits the mood of story that is horrific, perplexing, frustrating and endlessly fascinating because of  the numerous questions it raises.

Director Carr does not try to answer the multitude of questions this trial raised.  Which is a good thing considering that there are so many, and limited time.  Where this documentary succeeds best is when it debunks the simplistic view of this case and the reality of two young lives bound by mental illness and powerful medications that can distort perceptions of reality.

Looking past the hype that sensational cases have, it is all too easy to overlook that real lives are involved.  As much as this case looked like a fictional television crime drama, this is not fiction.  This is reality.

In the end, Carter is now serving a 15-month prison sentence. She was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter.

Now the courts must negotiate how to deal with a digital world for which there are no legal precedents.  Cyberspace was created without consideration of what the legal, ethical and moral ramifications would be.  Texting, video chat and social media have created a new reality.   It is one that we are still struggling to fully understand and manage.

Michelle Carter’s conviction raises not only issues of accountability, but issues related to free speech itself.  Naturally, this is an extreme case, but it does set up the idea that what you express in a text messages carries as much weight as being present.  This is not about what you have done, this is about what you have said.  While this case may seem simple, the issues this case raises and Carters’ conviction complicate an already problematic arena between personal liberty and accountability and responsibility.

The legal  world has yet to either embrace of understand the new digital reality.  Now we are all left with questions and confusion that a guilty verdict cannot neatly answer. We are also left with a death and a grieving family.

One very important point this documentary raises is that the systems that were designed to help young people like Michelle Carter and Conrad Roy failed them. Those systems failed them miserably.  We must now live with the truth that these failures will continue to  produce more lives either prematurely ended or forever damaged.

Kurt von Behrmann is a writer and artist living in South Mountain Village, Phoenix, AZ 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The First Signs of Real Change

The Washington Protests: the shape of things to come  A Limo on Fire, a wake up call, or A prelude of things to come? P rotests broke out in Washington D.C. during the inauguration of the controversial 45th President of the United States.  A distinguishing feature of this one was that it was not the product of spontaneous pandemonium.  This organized event brought together several groups unified in their shared beliefs.                 One statement made by this collective was so powerful that it explained succinctly the reasons for the discontent. It was a powerful message.                 Seeing a stretch limousine battered and flaming is an arresting image. What made this one potent were words spray-painted on the side “We The People.”  The connection between those words and the anger that co...

The Democratic Debates 2019

What have we learned from this "Food Fight" Part P.T. Barnum and Baily to several parts serious political discourse, one thing did come from all of this.  Past the novelty of having too many candidates with far too little to say on one stage, a star was born.  A few also happened to burn out, one in comic glory, of a sort. The first night of debates lacked any drama at all, good or bad.  The clear and undisputed winner was Elizabeth Warren.  While many see her elect-ability factor as a down side, she was the only person on the stage that left an impression.  She had a clear idea of what she was going to do and how to do it.  Everyone else, sadly, was one great big snooze fest.   There was no energy, no electricity.  There was no “ah” moment that made you feel strongly about anyone.  It was simply dry. No one seemed to grasp the idea that political life is part entertainment.  The only one who seemed to get that point w...

Pleasure Palace: A review of the documentary Queen of Versailles

The Queen of Versailles The 2008 financial crisis was the worst since the infamous Great Depression of 1929, the one that ended both fortunes and lives.   Florida billionaires David and Jackie Siegel found themselves impacted by the most recent as they began construction on their massive 90,000 square foot home.   If completed, it would be the largest private residence in the United States.   It is titled, appropriately enough, “ Versailles.”   The ironies in this tale are just beginning. Documentarian Lauren Greenfield was given free access to chronicle the lives of the Siegel’s at the apex of their wealth.   She incidentally caught them at the near total collapse of it.   In what could be the perfect storm for a film maker, Greenfields timing provides a fascinating view of the lives of the super rich, and it is not a particularly appealing one. It all begins like a fable.    It all turns out like the American Dream pumped on st...